I was looking at college majors and one said engineering general and another said engineering technician. What is the difference?
Which one do you want to be?
- Engineers are responsible for designing the items.
- Engineering technicians are responsible for drawing, testing, estimating and all the other work that brings the engineer's idea to life. Engineers also can do this kind of work and often do.
The design is the most important part and that requires the engineer to calculate if it can work, what the best approach is and how to do it. They get the most responsibility and so the higher pay.
The technician works for the engineer and is basically his assistant who helps to make the engineer's idea come to life.
I am Kumar and I am doing Engineering. I will try convincing you with the idea and knowledge I have got:-
Engineering - It refers to the honors course which leads of professional, accredited and managerial degree which allows you get the depth knowledge of subject matter with lot of hands on experience, industry experience and theory lessons with some modules of management.. which ultimately helps to grow in virtually any field in career.
Engineering Technician is nothing much a diploma degree where a person restricts himself in small tub of knowledge for kind of fixing things at a very basic level and as the technology advances the same will prove to be fatal because technician can't grow and move with the ever changing technology and scenarios.
Hope it helps.
Kumar
If you get a 4 year bachelor's degree in Engineering from a University, you then have the academic requirements for an Engineering License, which permits you to design things that have an impact on public safety, and entitles you to supervise their construction.
The engineering technician will do the labor part where he will follow the engineer's instructions.
Look at it this way:
Engineer = boss.
Engineer Technician = employee.
General engineering is often offered at schools that do not specialize in engineering. This gives you some engineering oriented coursework without concentrating on a particular discipline. This may include higher math and science as well as programming (software).
In contrast, a bachelor of science level degree in an engineering discipline requires significant mastery of high level math such as numerical analysis, high level physics, and in depth system analysis. The focus is on the underlying physical effects that dictate how the physical world behaves. The focus is on understanding how and why. This allows the engineer to find solutions to unsolved problems.
Engineer = white collar
Engineer tech = blue collar (probably associated with a union)
Now I know there are exceptions to this rule (i.e. a manufacturing engineer isn't really an engineer!), but this is what I've witnessed being an aerospace engineer for 2 years.
Engineer is a Bachelor's Degree (4-years).
Engineers make much more money and engage in more challenging and appealing work, though the technician's work does involve the development of technical skills to a very refined level.
It's a matter of how long you want to stay in college.
Engineer usually does not need to use tool to fix thing unless he is a very good engineer. Most engineer sits in his office to do his work. His earning at least double than a technican.
I'm a Lead Field Engineer,,, Obviously, I work in the field, this is where it all comes together. Technically, I'm the Engineer in the field. I oversee the installation of varies systems and at times I've had +250 people working directly for me. My responsibilities varies from spending countless hours on the phone with Engineers reviewing their design, interpreting design (the 2D to 3D transition can sometimes be very screwy, for some reason Engineers seem to have a hard time with this, the "Paper to Reality Paradox"), resolving conflicts between design disciplines (for some reason these Engineers seat across from one another and don't even speak), issue design changes (the Engineering Dah Factor), perform constructability reviews, manage manhours, deal with labor issues, schedule issues, weather, system start-up, vendors, so on so forth.
As for pay,,, I fall pretty much inline with the Engineers, some make more others make less. It all depends on years of service.
There's several factors you need to look at
1. What type of person are you? Hands on or off?
I'm a hands on guy, I want to be in the field where it all comes together, I'll let the offices guys do all the calcs, Cad, and paper stuff (boring if you ask me)
2. The Company you work for definitely has a bearing on your pay. Some value the field guys, some value the Engineer and others value both.
3. Depends on you,,,what type of person are you? A go getter done type, a follower, a hider or just plain lost. Trust me this has a major impact on your future, you can either ride the system and acheive the minimal or take the system by the hand and twist it for max.
Now the choice is totally up to you.... Which path to take.
Engineering definitely more indepth studies and beleive me I've met some great Engineers, guys who really know their stuff and design what was thought to be impossible. Future problem... Outsourceing,, more and more companies are outsourcing their engineering to India, China, etc.
Tech Engineer, allot less indepth study, more of a broader range of abilities when it comes to the hands on installation. I've worked with some of the best in this field. And we have built the impossible designs. Definitely can't outsource this job if built in the US.
Good Luck